Monday, August 26, 2013

Is Data-driven Mom Wrong?



Amy Webb recently got more attention for her parenting practice than most of us usually want.  Webb is a columnist on the online magazine Slate.  In her recent article, she shares one of the strategies she employs to raise her child.  The name of the article says it all: “I Measure Every Single Thing My Child Does, And I track it on spreadsheets. Really - every single thing. Even every poop. And it makes me a better parent.”

And she seems to be serious about it.  According to the article, she is a numbers person who analyzes data for a living.  So when she learned that she was pregnant, she started tracking things like food intake, weight gain, and activity level.  After her child was born and started losing weight, she began collecting data on her baby.  One thing led to another, and now she tracks just about everything her child (now a toddler) does.

As you might guess, this kind of practice has not been well received by many people – starting with her child’s pediatrician.  The vast majority of online responses to the article were very negative.  But Webb thinks that by attending to her daughter this closely and tracking how she responds in every situation, she is in a better position to determine what will help her child grow and develop.

Is she wrong?  This parenting strategy is clearly unconventional.  (Pause for those who marvel at the enormity of this understatement.)  Perhaps the Webbs can manage to keep records of their daughter’s every move and still be the kind of parents she needs.  I’ve been around long enough to know that some things that I would have thought were impossible can actually work, even things that run counter to all the research data.  I hope for the Webb family that this is true. 

Recent research on helicopter parenting doesn’t bode well for children of over-involved parents.  A cursory review of recent articles reveals that as these children become adults, they can be less satisfied, less autonomous, less competent and less successful in relationships than their peers.

This approach is not for me.  I’m not good with such details.  I am sure most of us would find Webb’s strategy burdensome, impersonal, and antiseptic.  Where is the joy?  Where are the time-honored traditions?  Where is the magic?  Of course, part of her point is that it’s not magic, it’s cause and effect.  And to a certain extent she is probably right about that.  We almost certainly don’t know enough about such cause-and-effect relationships, but someday we may.  It’s possible that if this happens, Webb may seem more like a pioneer than a helicopter mom on steroids.

There’s so much we don’t know about this situation.  Webb’s article doesn’t tell us what makes her daughter laugh or cry, or what they do for fun on Saturday afternoons, or what drives the parents up a wall.  I’d like to be a fly on their wall; maybe Webb’s interactions with her daughter aren’t that different from what we see with most parents and children.  I heard her on the radio, and she sounds like a mother who loves her daughter; that’s a good starting point.

I hope Webb’s daughter learns that her parents love her and are always in her corner.  I hope her parents play with her, sing her songs at bedtime, and dry her tears when she cries.  I hope she learns that there are rules that must be followed, that at times she must control her behavior, and that she can’t always have everything she wants.  I hope they teach her to share, and to be a humble winner and a gracious loser.  I hope she develops the self-confidence that comes from life’s successes and failures, and from learning that she can have an impact on her world.  I hope she learns that all children deserve the same opportunities.  If these things happen, then I think her parents did their job – spreadsheets or no spreadsheets.